|
Columnists
![]() ![]()
|
ARTICLE SUMMARYIs Gordon Brown really that bad?POOR OLD Gordon. If he is not bumping his head on aircraft, stumbling over his words or being photographed looking awkward, then he is loosing by-elections. But is he really that bad? Pages: 1 |
|
|||||||
















IS HE?. OH BROTHER, SOMEBODY IS KIDDING LIKE MAD.
06.08.08, 5:28pm
Brown is the epitome of political bad. Think of all the labour party leaders over the last sixty three years - Wilson, the man with the brain of a fourteen year old, Callaghan, the ex. stoker who never had a fire in his belly. Foot?. Give me strength. Kinnock?. There are fifteenyear old council kids with more brains and character. Blair? I'll try to be poite. A liar a poser, a ruthlessly self-centred hypocrite. That's as nice as I can get. Now Brown. Well, the bumbling f..t is simply of the same old mould, different looks, Pickwick papers and all that, but as a chancellor he was totally inefficient. He wrecked, deliberately, the finest pension schemes on earth, he applied taxation on far too many aspects of our lives, and became a depressing name to think of. He has ruined our economy and almost emptied our coffers. Is he really that bad?. The person who asked that question - could I politely wring your neck?.
Posted by: bluenote Report Comment
WHIRLWINDWESTMINSTER
25.07.08, 6:48pm
I do not know who this 'journalist' is but I must ask the question;Why on earth is he/she being paid by the DE for such disjointed drivel?
Here is an opportunity to write an in-depth article, with the benefit of a personal encounter and what do we get - a jumble of disjointed words which could easily be attributed to a 10 year old.
Mr Editor please, send this person back to the coffee round.
Posted by: emigrant Report Comment
NO BRAINER!
25.07.08, 6:48pm
In a word: YES.
Posted by: wiggins Report Comment