JOHNSON & CAPELLO: MORE TO OUR LEADERS THAN MEETS THE EYE
TOUGH TESTS: Fabio Capello and Martin Johnson will need more than passion and steel
Friday November 14,2008
By John Dillon
TO BORROW and adapt some of the words of the late, great Ian Dury in Sweet Gene Vincent: “Black hair, white shirt, dark eyes, thick brows, hard stare, straight face, black specs, clear sight.”
OK, that doesn’t have the rumbustious old Bard of Essex’s magic touch and only Fabio Capello wears glasses while Martin Johnson does not.
But there is a brooding, beetlish similarity about the clouded looks of our national football and rugby team coaches, matched by their equal reputations for toughness and clarity of thought.
The English have finally been given what they want in their sporting leaders. A couple of hard men, who take neither nonsense nor prisoners. Or so the instant, but shallow perception goes.
As Johnson prepares for his first big examination in charge at Twickenham against Australia tomorrow and Capello heads to Germany for a friendly next week as the indefatigable general who conquered Zagreb and Minsk, it is time to explode the persistent idea that the only qualities such men require for their jobs are passion and steel.
Passion has become one of the most over-used and over-valued words in sport.
In the management game, they are vital, of course. But “passion”, in particular, has become one of the most over-used and over-valued words in sport. It is worth nothing without understanding, mental insight and a knowledge of when to light a player’s fires rather than just give him a roasting.
In this sporting era, the psychologist is as prevalent around the training ground as the physiotherapist.
This makes it incomprehensible why so many fans – of both shaped balls – persist in bawling out the simplistic idea that all any athlete needs to make him tick properly is a good kick up the backside.
Johnson has opted for the charging bull approach by recalling Phil Vickery and teaming him across from Andrew Sheridan in his scrum to confront the Aussies; but come on, this is rugby. It’s what has to be done and doesn’t signify any lack of subtlety about Johnson’s thought processes.
If he was lacking in broader insight, as the popular perception of him as the hulking Quiet Man might suggest, how come the impressively broad and thoughtful start in command last weekend, admittedly against the scratch side of the Pacific Islanders?
This was an awkward opening for Johnson. But he emerged from it with credit for awarding five new caps and summoning from the debutant full-back Delon Armitage a performance the coach described as the best initiation into international rugby he had witnessed. This represented boldness, shrewdness and a knowledge of how to make a player feel 10 feet tall rather than a successful rush of mere “passion”.
The half-time team talk which improved England’s display may, of course, have involved an old-fashioned rollocking. They will never go out of fashion. But as Johnson was eager to give credit to all his coaches afterwards, it seems more likely it involved careful analysis and logical working out of solutions.
After the indisciplined mess of the tour to New Zealand under Rob Andrew’s temporary stewardship last summer, it does no harm that England have the toughest of tough guys in place now. The published and much-publicised revelations of Mike Catt and Lawrence Dallaglio suggested too that it was the big spirits of some of the players rather than the genial thoughtfulness of Brian Ashton which drove England to the World Cup final just over a year ago.
To his credit, Ashton always acknowledged their passion. He said, rightly, it was a given in international rugby. But he always made it clear his players offered so much more.
Capello’s predecessor, Steve McClaren, left only a void. The Italian has turned things around in the early stages of the World Cup campaign by using disciplinarian methods and doing his nut on the touchline when things go wrong, it is said. Yet this is also too simplistic.
What Capello has actually done is to understand that English footballers, in particular, respond to firmly delineated guidelines and clear instructions.
This is a theory he calculated long ago and which is based on logic, the opposite of blind “passion”. But he knows it can be inspirational, as the re-emergence of Wayne Rooney and Frank Lampard under his guidance proves; as the lift-off of Theo Walcott illustrates.
And now we have Harry Redknapp transforming Spurs by “stroking some egos,” according to Fraizer Campbell after Wednesday’s 4-2 defeat of Liverpool.
The blow-hards of the stands and the saloon bar find it all too easy to demand zero tolerance of the sporting stars they view as pampered and over-paid.
A thumping heart and a clenched fist are the only tools too many wish to acknowledge. The professionals understand a whole lot more.