KNOWLEDGE ISN'T KEY FOR MINISTERS OF SPIN
IGNORANT: Byrne only wants civil servants to tell him part of what he should know
Wednesday November 19,2008
By Ann Widdecombe
IN a long list of instructions to civil servants, Liam Byrne, Gordon Brown’s new enforcer, asks them not to tell him what they think he should know but what they expect he might be asked.
This says everything there is to say about government today.
It is a candid and disturbing admission – reminiscent of Yes, Prime Minister – that what matters is PR, not real knowledge and governance.
The first duty of any official should be to give the minister the whole picture. When the minister has under- stood the situation as fully as possible then it is appropriate to worry about what others might ask.
If ministers aren’t fully briefed then no wonder the public has to manage with half-lies and inadequate information.
Years ago, when I was pensions minister in John Major’s government, I mentioned in a private conversation with a Labour spokesman that I felt it important that the public should know how the national insurance system worked because most thought it a fund which built up instead of the pay-as-you-go system it really is, with today’s takings paying today’s pensioners.
She retorted that it wasn’t at all necessary and that I only thought that because it backed up my argument that we could not restore the earnings link without raiding taxes.
I thought that an eccentricity until the weekend when I realised that appalling approach is now officially sanctioned.
Never mind the reality, what will John Humphrys ask me? This appears to be all that matters. Goodness knows how much of vital importance can be missed that way.
A civil servant has a duty to tell his minister what he thinks that minister ought to know and he cannot simply discard it because it is unlikely to be featured in questions.
Byrne would appear to be inviting his staff to neglect their prime function and he also appears to be saying that
ignorance is of no consequence as long as he sounds good when answering questions.
I doubt if any of those civil servants are even surprised because Government has been ruled by spin for a decade.
What you don’t know you can’t tell. Fine but nor can you make good judgments. I have never understood how the current economic mess was allowed to get so badly out of control.
Leverage is a posh word for borrowing and hedge fund is a posh phrase for a betting organisation.
Therefore a hedge fund operating on leverage is betting with borrowed money and they all appear to have been borrowing from each other. It was the economy of the madhouse.
Presumably some minister was so bothered about what he might be asked on Question Time that he didn’t do any asking of vital questions himself. What a way to run a country.
Yet now that way is the norm. All that civil servants are expected to concentrate on is where the trip wires might be, not on whether the device might explode anyway.
I can hope only that Liam Byrne’s permanent secretary (the senior civil servant in any department) said: “No, Minister.”
WHY DO THE WORKING CLASS VOTE LABOUR?
27.11.08, 12:07pm
Re comments posted by 'voter' - Norman Tebbit often used to say why do people vote labour when they do not support labour's policies? Eg on the subject of capital punishment, the last time there was a vote, the proportion of the population supporting capital punishment matched the proportion of conservative MPs supporting it. The proportion of labour MPs voting for was about 1%
Labour don't represent the working class. They represent sociology lecturers, trade union officials, local council officials and that type of person. The kind of person who thinks it is a good idea to cause traffic holdups all over the country and spend huge amounts of money in order to paint green boxes where the traffic stops in front of traffic lights for no purpose. They are the kind of people who are in power now.
Posted by: StephenB Report Comment
UTTER CONTEMPT FOR THE ELECTORATE
22.11.08, 5:48am
'Voter' is spot on regarding the truth about Labour's policies and intentions (and they may have even more calamitous initiatives on their agenda)
Unfortunately, knowledge of all this might very well scare the electorate into never voting again which would leave this collection of policy-wonk geeks, charlatans, liars, free loaders and out-and-out crooks in power for ever
Posted by: Rafer Report Comment
SOCIALISM CANNOT STAND THE TRUTH
20.11.08, 7:40am
Ann Widdecombe is right again. Socialism cannot stand the truth; if people knew the truth about it they would never vote. Imagine saying to people this: vote for us so that we can give perverse sex instruction to your children from the age of three; vote for us to scrap marriage; vote for us and we will have the highest taxes in the history of the country; vote for us and we will promise you a referendum on the EU and then not give you one; vote for us and we will increase immigration; vote for us and we will make political correctness more important to the police than solving crime; vote for us, we hold you in contempt.
Posted by: voter Report Comment
To view all 'Have Your Say' comments, click this button...